Post-Cretaceous record of larger foraminifera from the Shillong Plateau, India: an evidence of environmental recovery during Early Cenozoic

A.K. Jauhri

doi:10.54991/jop.1997.1325

Authors

A.K. Jauhri Department of Geology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226007, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54991/jop.1997.1325

Keywords:

Larger foraminifera, Shillong Plateau, Cretaceous, Thanetian, India

Abstract

The Late and post-Cretaceous succession of larger benthic foraminifera and planktic microfossils from the Shillong Plateau indicates events of extinction and recovery of the biotic forms. These events are interpreted using a conceptual framework involving biological responses to environmental changes caused by eustatic and climatic variations. Stratigraphic distribution shows that the Late Maastrichtian larger benthic foraminiferal assemblage disappears earlier than the planktic microfossils at the boundary interval. After their last occurrence in the Upper Maastrichtian, the larger foraminifera reappears in the carbonates of the Lakadong Formation dated by Glomalveolina primaeva as the Thanetian (P4).

The event of the first appearance of larger foraminifera in the Shillong Plateau correlates with zone P4. When compared with other Tethyan sections (e.g., Mediterranean) where they start occurring in the strata equivalent to zone P3b, the event of their reappearance appears to be slightly delayed in the studied section. The P3b zone is the interval marked by the onsetting of habitable conditions on shelves (oligotrophic environments) and is followed by an interval (the equivalent of the P4 zone) of extensive carbonate generation, during which highly diversified larger foraminiferal assemblages evolve and become widely distributed. The Shillong assemblage, therefore, marks the phase of "expanded oligotrophy" in which recovery of carbonate platform environments occurred on a large scale on shallow neritic shelves.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bhandari N, Gupta M, Pandey J & Shukla PN 1994. Chemical profiles in K/T boundary section of Meghalaya, India; Cometary, asteroidal or volcanic. Chem. Geol. 113: 45-60.

Brasier MD 1995. Fossil indicators of nutrient levels. 2: Evolution and extinction in relation to oligotrophy. In: Bosence DWJ & Allison PA (Editors) - Marine palaeoenvironmental analysis from fossils, Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 83: 133-150.

Caron M & Homewood P 1983. Evolution of Early planktic foraminifers. Marine Micropaleont. 7: 453-462.

Fischer RG & Arthur MA 1977. Secular variations in the pelagic realm. SEPM Spec. Publ. 25: 19-50.

Garg R & Jain KP 1993. Dinoflagellate cysts and calcareous nannoplankton across K/T Boundary Event at Um Sohryngkew River, Meghalaya, India. Abstract Fifth Int. Conf. Modern and fossil dinoflagellates, Zeist: 43. The Netherlands.

Garg R & Jain KP 1995. Significance of the terminal Cretaceous calcareous nannofossil marker Micula prinsii at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary in the Um Sohryngkew section, Meghalaya, India. Curr. Sci. 66(12): 1012-1017.

Ghose BK 1976. Palaeogene reef rock-complex of Meghalaya and its oil potentialities. Sci. Cult. 42: 248-253.

Ghosh AMN 1940. The stratigraphical position of the Cherrs Sandstone, Assam. Rec. geol. Surv. India 75: 1-19.

Hallock P 1987. Fluctuations in the trophic resource continuum a factor in global diversity cycles? Palaeoceanography 2: 457-471.

Hallock P, Premoli Silva 1 & Boersma A 1991. Similarities between planktonic and larger foraminiferal evolutionary trends through Paleogene paleoceanographic changes. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 83: 49-64.

Hottinger L 1982. Larger foraminifera, giant cells with a historical background. Naturwissenschaften 69: 361-371.

Hottinger L 1983. Processes determining the distribution of larger foraminifera in space and time. Utrecht Micropaleont. Bull. 30: 239. 253.

Hottinger L 1987. Conditions for generating carbonate platforms. Mem Soc. Geol, italiana 40: 267-271.

Hottinger L 1994. Early Palaeogene Benthos-286. Aspect Field Meeting Report. UNESCO and IUGS supplementary Contribution (unpublished): 1-9.

Jauhri AK 1994. Carbonate buildup in the South Shillong Plateau, N.E India: a micropalaeontological perspective. In: Matteucel R Carboni MG & Pignatti JS (Editors) - Studies on ecology and palaeoecology of benthic communities, Boll. Soc. Palaeont Italliana, Spec. Vol. 2: 157-169. Mucchi, Modena.

Jauhri AK 1996. Ranikothalia nuttalli (Davies), a distinctive early Ilerdian marker, in the Shillong Plateau. In: Pandey J, Azmi RJ, Bhandari A & Dave A (Editors)-Contributions to XV Indian Colloquium on Micropalaeontology and Stratigraphy, Dehradun 209-217.

Jauhri AK (in review). The Thanetian-llerdian transition in the South Shillong Plateau, N.E. India: some interpretations in the light of sequence-stratigraphic observations.

Keller G 1988. Biotic turnover in benthic foraminifera across the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary at EL KEF, Tunisia. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 66: 153-171.

Murty KN 1983. Geology and hydrocarbon prospects of Assam shelf. recent advances and present status. In: Bhandari LL. et al. (Editors) - Petroliferous basins of India, Petroleum Asia Jl 1:1-14.

Nagappa Y 1959. Foraminiferal biostratigraphy of Cretaceous-Eocene succession in the India-Pakistan-Burma region. Micropaleontology 5(2): 141-181.

Pandey J 1981. Cretaceous foraminifera of Um Sohryngkew River section, Meghalaya. J. palaeont. Soc. India 25: 53-74.

Pandey J 1990. Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary, iridium anomaly and foraminiferal breaks in the Um Sohryngkew River section, Meghalaya. Curr. Sci. 59: 570-575.

Pandey J & Ravindran CN 1988. Foraminiferal control in the Indian Palaeocene. In: Maheshwari HK (Editor) - Palaeocene of India, I.A.P. Publ. 4: 124-184.

Pianka ER 1970. On r- and k-selection. Am. Naturalist 104: 592-597.

Sirel E, Dager Z & Sozeri B 1986. Some biostratigraphic and palaeogeographic observations on the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary in the Haymana-Polatli region (Central Turkey). Lecture Notes in Earth Sci. 8: 385-396.