Prospects of shale gas exploitation in Lower Gondwana of Raniganj Coalfield (West Bengal), India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54991/jop.2016.297Keywords:
Permian shales, Rock–Eval pyrolysis, Thermal maturity, Pore structures, Adsorption–desorption isotherm, Hydrocarbon potentialAbstract
Geochemical analyses such as proximate, pyrolysis, TOC and FTIR, and other analyses like surface area, pore size, pore volume (using low–pressure N2 physisorption measurements) and SEM were performed on the shale samples derived from Early Permian Barakar and Late Permian Barren Measures formations of the Raniganj Coalfield, West Bengal. Rock–Eval pyrolysis and TOC data indicated that the heterogeneity of Barren Measures and Barakar shales is laterally varying, but in general, factors which support the occurrence of shale gas accumulations include a moderate to high TOC content (3.38–7.87 wt.%) with sufficient thermal maturity and type III–IV organic matters (kerogens). FTIR spectra indicate the presence of quartz and kaolinite with absorbance bandwidth between 1200–800 cm−1 and 3750–3400 cm−1, respectively. Abundance of quartz, as compared to clay, points towards the brittle characteristics of shales favourable for good fracability. Besides, mesopores and macropores are well–developed and the capacity of gas generation and adsorption are significant.
On the basis of SEM, the pores are classified into four types– (i) inter–granular pores, (ii) dissolve pores, (iii) composite inter–granular pores, and (iv) hair line micro–fractures. The BET multipoint surface area varies from 8.104 to 16.937 m2/g and 17.376 to 29.675 m2/g for Barakar and Barren Measures shales, respectively. Size of the pores varies from 3.072 to 3.728 nm for the Barakar shales and 2.984 to 3.521 nm for the Barren Measures shales, as measured by BJH method. Overall, it is observed that mesopores, macropores, micro–fractures and micropores are adequate in the samples and the studied shales are having interconnected networks of natural cracks and pores system, which may control the storage and migration of shale gas in the reservoir.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Barker C 1974. Pyrolysis techniques for source rock evaluation. American Association Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 58: 2349–2361.
BIS 1995. Methods of Test for Coal and Coke (second revision of IS: 1350). Part I, Proximate analysis. Bureau of Indian Standard, pp. 1–29.
Blanford WT 1861. On the geological structure and relations of the Raniganj Coalfield, Bengal. Memoir Geological Survey of India 3 (Part I), 118p.
Brunauer S, Deming LS, Deming WS & Teller E 1940. On a theory of the Vanderwaals adsorption of gases. Journal of American Chemical Society 62: 1723–1732.
Bustin RM, Bustin AMM, Cui A, Ross D & Pathi VM 2008. Impact of shale properties on pore structure and storage characteristics. SPE Shale Gas Production Conference (November 16–18), Fort Worth, Texas, USA, http: //dx.doi.org/10.2118/119892–MS.
Chen Y, Furmann A, Mastalerz M & Schimmelmann A 2014. Quantitative analysis of shales by KBr–FTIR and micro–FTIR. Fuel 116: 538–549.
Clarkson CR, Jensen JL & Blasingame TA 2011. Reservoir engineering for unconventional gas reservoirs: What do we have to consider. SPE North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition (June 14–16), The Woodlands, Texas, USA, http: //www.pe.tamu.edu/blasingame/data/ 0_TAB_Public/TAB_Publications/SPE_145080_(Clarkson)_Res_Eng_Uncon_Reservoirs.pdf.
Claypool G & Pimmel A 2001. Introduction to shipboard organic geochemistry on the JOIDES Resolution. ODP Technical Note 30. Web: < http: //www–odp.tamu.edu/publications/ notes/tn30/INDEX.HTM>
Claypool GE & Reed PR 1976. Thermal analysis technique for source rock evaluation: Quantitative estimate of organic richness and effects of lithologic variation. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 60: 608–626.
Clementz DM, Demaison GJ & Daly AR 1979. Well site geochemistry by programmed pyrolysis. Proceedings of 11th Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston (OTC 3410) 1: 465–470.
de Boer JH 1958. The structure and properties of porous materials. Butterworths, London, 68p.
Dutt AB (Ed.) 2003. Coalfields of India—Coal resources of West Bengal. Bulletin of Geological Survey of India, Series A (No. 45) 5: 23–96.
Ekweozor CM & Gormly JR 1983. Petroleum geochemistry of Late Cretaceous and Early Tertiary shales penetrated by Akukwa–2 well in the Anambra Basin, Southern Nigeria. Journal of Petroleum Geology 6: 207–216.
Espitaliè J, Laporte JL, Madec M, Marquis F, Leplat P & Paulet J 1977. Methode rapide de caracterisation des roches meres, de leur potential petrolier et de leur degree d’evolution. Review of Institute Petroleum 32: 23–45.
Espitaliè J, Marquis F & Barsony I 1984. Geochemical logging. In: Voorhees KJ (Editor)—Analytical pyrolysis–Techniques and applications, Boston, Butterworth, pp. 276–304.
Fox CS 1928. Barakar–Ironstone shale boundary near Begunia and Raniganj–Panchet boundary near Asansol, Raniganj Coalfield. Record Geological Survey of India, Part 4, 60: 363–366.
Gee ER 1932. The geology and coal resources of Raniganj Coalfield. Memoir Geological Survey of India 61: 1–187.
Ghosh SC 2002. The Raniganj Coal Basin: An example of an Indian Gondwana rift. Sedimentary Geology 147: 155–176.
Gregg SJ & Sing KSW 1982. Adsorption, surface area and porosity. 2nd Edition, Academic Press, New York, 303p.
Guarnone M, Rossi F, Negri E, Grassi C, Genazzi D & Zennaro R 2012. An unconventional mindset for shale gas surface facilities. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 6: 14–23.
Guo Y & Bustin RM 1998. Micro–FTIR spectroscopy of liptinite macerals in coal. International Journal of Coal Geology 36: 259–275.
Gupta S, Mondal D & Bardhan A 2012. Geochemical provenance and spatial distribution of fluoride in groundwater in parts of Raniganj Coalfield, West Bengal, India. Archives Applied Science Research 4(1): 292–306.
Hakimi MH, Abdullah WH, Sia SG & Makeen YM 2013. Organic geochemical and petrographic characteristics of Tertiary coals in the northwest Sarawak, Malaysia: implications for palaeoenvironmental conditions and hydrocarbon generation potential. Marine Petroleum Geology 48: 31–46.
Hazra B, Varma AK, Bandopadhyay AK, Mendhe VA, Singh BD, Saxena VK, Samad SK & Mishra DK 2015. Petrographic insights of organic matter conversion of Raniganj Basin shales, India. International Journal of Coal Geology 150–151: 193–209.
Hill RJ, Jarvie DM, Zumberge J, Henry M & Pollastro RM 2007. Oil and gas geochemistry and petroleum systems of the Fort Worth Basin. American Association Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 91: 445–473.
Horsfield B 1985. Pyrolysis studies in petroleum exploration. In: Brooks J & Welte D (Editors)—Advances in Petroleum Geochemistry 1: 247–298.
Hunt JM 1996. Petroleum Geochemistry and Geology. 2nd Edition, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 743p.
Ibrahimbas A & Riediger C 2004. Hydrocarbon source rock potential as determined by Rock–Eval 6/TOC pyrolysis, Northeast British Columbia and Northwest Alberta. Resource Development and Geoscience Branch Summary of Activities, British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines, pp. 7–18.
Jarvie DM, Claxton BL, Henk F & Breyer JT 2001. Oil and shale gas from the Barnett Shale, Ft. Worth Basin, Texas. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 85: A100 (No. 13 supplement)
Jarvie DM, Hill RJ & Pollastro RM 2005. Assessment of the gas potential and yields from shales: The Barnett Shale Model. Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular 110: 37–50.
Jarvie DM, Hill RJ, Ruble TE & Pollastro RM 2007. Unconventional shale–gas systems: The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale–gas assessment. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 91: 475–499.
Kuila U & Prasad M 2013. Specific surface area and pore–size distribution in clays and shales. Geophysical Prospecting EAGE 61: 341–362.
Kuila U, Prasad M, Derkowski A & McCarty DK 2012. Compositional controls on mudrock pore–size distribution: An example from Nibrara Formation. SPE Annual Technical and Exhibition (October 8–10), San Antonio, USA, http: //dx.doi.org/10.2118/160141–MS.
Labani MM, Rezaee R, Saeedi A & Hinai AA 2013. Evaluation of pore size spectrum of gas shale reservoirs using low pressure nitrogen adsorption, gas expansion and mercury porosimetry: A case study from the Perth and Canning Basins, western Australia. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 112: 7–16.
Lafargue E, Marquis F & Pillot D 1998. Rock–Eval–6 applications in hydrocarbon exploration, production and soil contamination studies. Oil Gas Science Technology 53: 421–437.
Langford FF & Blanc–Valleron MM 1990. Interpreting Rock–Eval pyrolysis data using graphs of pyrolizable hydrocarbons vs. total organic carbon. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 74: 799–804.
Larter SR & Douglas AG 1982. Pyrolysis methods in organic geochemistry: An overview. Journal of Annals Applied Pyrolysis 4: 1–19.
Li S, Dong M, Li Z, Huang S, Qing H & Nickel E 2005. Gas breakthrough pressure for hydrocarbon reservoir seal rocks: Implications for the security of long–term CO2 storage in the Weyburn field. Geofluids 5: 326–334.
Loucks RG, Reed RM, Ruppel SC & Jarvie DM 2009. Morphology, genesis and distribution of nanometer–scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett Shale. Journal of Sedimentary Research 79: 848–861.
Majumdar AK, Banerjee SP & Das AK 1977. Report on the exploratory drilling in Poradiha area, Raniganj Coalfield, Bankura and Purulia districts, West Bengal. Progress Report, Geological Survey of India (unpublished).
Mendhe VA, Mishra S, Kamble AD, Bannerjee M, Mukherjee S, Kumar V & Sinha A 2015a. Shale gas and emerging energy resource: Prospects in India. Indian Mining and Engineering Journal 54: 21–31.
Mendhe VA, Kamble AD, Bannerjee M, Mishra S, Mukherjee S & Mishra P 2015b. Evaluation of shale gas reservoir in Barakar and Barren Measures formations of North and South Karanpura coalfields, Jharkhand. Journal Geological Society of India (in press).
Moenke HHW 1974. Silica, the three–dimensional silicates, borosilicates and berylium silicates. In: Farmer VC (Editor)—Infrared spectra of minerals, Mineralogical Society, London, pp. 365–382.
Mukhopadhyay G, Mukhopadhyay SK, Roychowdhury M & Parui PK 2010. Stratigraphic correlation between different Gondwana basins of India. Journal of Geological Society of India 76: 251–266.
Nicholas BH, Katherine HF, Richard DP, Timothy SW & Gareth DM 2004. The character and origin of lacustrine source rocks in the Lower Cretaceous synrift section, Congo Basin, West Africa. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 88: 1163–1184.
Nuñez–betelu L & Baceta JI 1994. Basics and application of Rock–Eval/TOC Pyrolysis: An example from the uppermost Paleocene/lowermost Eocene in the Basque Basin, Western Pyrenees. San Sebastian 46: 43–62.
Ogala JE 2011. Hydrocarbon potential of the Upper Cretaceous coal and shale units in the Anambra Basin, Southeastern Nigeria. Petroleum and Coal 53: 35–44.
Painter PC, Snyder RW, Starsinic M, Coleman MM, Kuehn DW & Davis A 1981. Concerning the applications of FTIR to the study of coal: A critical assessment of band assignments and the application of spectral analysis programs. Applied Spectroscopy 35: 475–485.
Painter PC, Starsinic M & Coleman MM 1985. Determination of functional groups in coal by Fourier transform interferometry. In: Ferraro JR & Basile LJ (Editors)—Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, vol. 4, Academic Press, New York, pp. 169–241.
Peters KE 1986. Guidelines for evaluating petroleum source rock using programmed pyrolysis. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 70: 318–329.
Peters KE & Cassa MR 1994. Applied source rock geochemistry. In: Magoon LB & Dow WG (Editors)—The petroleum system from source to trap, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 60: 93–120.
Quantachrome 2014. Characterizing porous materials and powders–AutosorbiQ and ASiQwin Gas Sorption System operating manual.volume II: 199–426.
Rouquerol F, Rouquerol J & Sing K 1999. Adsorption by powders and porous solids: Principles, methodology and application. ISBN 0–12–598920–2, Academic Press, London, 465p.
Rowe HD, Loucks RG, Ruppel SC & Rimmer SM 2008. Mississippian Barnett Formation, Fort Worth Basin, Texas: Bulk geochemical inferences and Mo–TOC on the severity of hydrographic restriction. Chemical Geology 257: 16–25.
Schlömer S & Krooss BM 1997. Experimental characterization of the hydrocarbon sealing efficiency of cap rocks. Marine and Petroleum Geology 14: 565–580.
Sing KS, Everett DH, Haul RAW, Moscou L, Pierotti RA, Roquerol J & Siemieniewska T 1985. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Applied Chemistry 57: 603–619.
Strapoc D, Mastalerz M, Schimmelmann A, Drobniak A & Hasenmueller NR 2010. Geochemical constraints on the origin and volume of gas in the New Albany Shale (Devonian–Mississippian), eastern Illinois Basin. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 94: 1713–1740.
Sykes R & Snowdon LR 2002. Guidelines for assessing petroleum potential of coaly source rocks using Rock–Eval pyrolysis. Organic Geochemistry 33: 1441–1455.
Tissot BP & Welte DH 1984. Petroleum Formation and Occurrence. 2nd Edition, Springer–Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Newyork, Tokyo, 669p.
Varma AK, Biswal S, Hazra B, Mendhe VA, Misra S, Samad SK, Singh BD, Dayal AM & Mani D 2015a. Petrographic characteristics and methane sorption dynamics of coal and shaly–coal samples from Ib Valley Basin, Odisha, India. International Journal of Coal Geology 141–142: 51–62.
Varma AK, Chinara I, Mendhe VA & Singh BD 2011. Hydrocarbon generation evaluation through Rock–Eval pyrolysis–A case study of Raniganj coal basin, West Bengal, India. In: Varma OP et al. (Editors)—Proceedings of 17th Convention Indian Geological Congress & International Conference New Paradigms of Exploration Sustainable Mineral Development, Dhanbad, pp. 475–483.
Varma AK, Hazra B, Mendhe VA, Chinara I & Dayal AM 2015b. Assessment of organic richness and hydrocarbon generation potential of Raniganj Basin shales, West Bengal, India. Marine and Petroleum Geology 59: 480–490.
Varma AK, Hazra B, Samad SK, Panda S & Mendhe VA 2014. Methane sorption dynamics and hydrocarbon generation of shale samples from West Bokaro and Raniganj basins, India. Journal of Natural Gas Science Engineering 21: 1138–1147.
Varma AK, Khatun M, Mendhe VA, Hazra B, Singh BD & Dayal AM 2015c. Petrographic characterization and Langmuir volume of shales from Raniganj coal basin, India. Journal of Geological Society of India 86: 283–294.
Wang X, Gao S & Gao C 2014. Geological features of Mesozoic lacustrine shale gas in south of Ordos Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development 41: 326–337.
Ward CR 2002. Analysis and significance of mineral matter in coal seams. International Journal of Coal Geology 50: 135–168.
Yang F, Ning Z & Liu H 2014. Fractal characteristics of shales from a shale gas reservoir in the Sichuan Basin, China. Fuel 115: 378–384.
Yuguang H, Sheng HE, Jizheng YI, Baiqiao Z, Xuehui C, Yi W, Jiankun Z & Chunyang C 2014. Effect of pore structure on methane sorption potential of shales. Petroleum Exploration and Development 41: 272–281.
Zhang T, Ellis GS, Ruppel SC, Milliken K &Yang R 2012. Effect of organic matter type and thermal maturity on methane adsorption in shale–gas system. Organic Geochemistry 47: 120–131.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
