The Leaf-Base and the Interdone- Their true Morphology

Authors

  • G.C. Mitra Department of Botany, University of Delhi
  • G.P. Majumdar Department of Botany, University of Dacca

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54991/jop.1952.416

Abstract

  1. Development of the leaf primordium at the shoot apices of 14 species of dicotyledons has been studied.
  2. These include exstipulate, stipulate and sheathing leaves with or without a free base.
  3. The axial component which is laid down first during the initiation of a leaf development at the apex of a vegetative shoot is a part of the leaf and is to be considered as its base.
  4. In species where a free base is wanting, the axial component represents the only base and the cauline and discontinuous stipular scar, which led Ponzo, Cross and others to doubt the origin of stipules from the leaf-base, is explained.
  5. The development of a free base in the form of a sheath and/or a pair of stipules depends on the course and behaviour of the trace bundles through the axial component (e.g. in species of Centella, Polygonum, Ixora, Ervatamia, Rosa, Morus, Calotropis, Artocarpus, Ficus, Paederia, Hibiscus and Pisum).
  6. If the laterals change their vertical course, bend and follow an oblique horizontal course towards the median at the top of the axial component, the petiole appears to be inserted directly on the axis without any evident base (free) as in the species of Ficus, Paederia, Jasminum, Hibiscus, Morus and Pisum
  7. If during the horizontal course the laterals branch in the axial component, a single (Ficus elastica, Ervatamia divaricata, Polygonum orientale), or a pair of stipules (Ficus religiosa, Artocarpus integrifolia, Morus alba, Hibiscus rosa-sinensis, Pisum sativum and Rosa centifolia), or a composite stipule (Ixora parviflora and Paederia foetida), are formed with the branches as their traces, and the stipular scars appear cauline.
  8. If the laterals, two or many, run almost parallel to one another and to the median, even after leaving the axial component for some time before they turn towards the median, a sheathing but free base is formed which partially or completely encloses the axis, depending on the number and nature of the course of the laterals (e.g. Centella and Rosa).
  9. If in a multilacunar node the laterals branch during their horizontal course towards the median the stipule formed is either an ochrea (Polygonum), or bud scales (species of Ficus and Artocarpus).
  10. If, however, the laterals do not branch and gradually shift towards the median where they form with the latter a ring of vascular bundles, the sheath becomes oblique and tapering without any stipule (Centella).
  11. The base, i.e. the axial component, and its free portion, if there be any, can be anatomically distinguished by the nature and behaviour of the laterals, from the petiole: in the base they gradually approach the median without joining it and may branch, but in petiole they either join with the median (Rosa) or arrange themselves with the latter in the form of a ring of vascular bundles (Centella). They again branch in connection with leaflet and lamina formation.
  12. The internode is made up of an axial core and a mantle derived from two different zones of the eumeristem - the corpus and the flank meristems. The mantle is made by base or bases (axial component or components) of the leaves, and extends radially up to the pith as suggested by Hofmeister.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

*CELAKOVSKY, L. J. (1901). Die Gleiderung der Kaulome. Bot. Zeit. 59:79-114.

*CHAUVEAUD, G. (1921). La constitution des Plantes vascularise revelee par leur Ontogenie. Paris.

CRAFTS, A. S. (1943). Vascular differentiation in the shoot apex of Sequia sempervirens. Amer. J. Bot. 30:110-21 ; 382-83.

CROSS, G. L. (1937). The origin and development of the foliage leaves and stipules of Morus alba. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 64:145-63.

Idem (1942). Structure of the apical meristem and development of the foliage leaves of Cunninghamia lanceolata. Amer. J. Bot. 29: 288-301.

*DECANDOLLE, C. (1868). Theorie de la Feuille. Arch. de la Bibi. Universelle. 32: 32-64.

*DELPINO, F. (1880, 1883). Theoria generale de la Filotassi. For ref. See Bot. Jahr. 8:118 ; ibid. 9: 550; also see Bower, Origin of Land Flora. P. 134. 1908.

*EICHLER, A. W. (1861). Zu Entwickelungsgeschichte des Blattes mit besonderer Berucksichtigung der Nebenblatt-Bildung. (Inang Diss.) p. 1-60. Marburg.

ENGARD, J. A. (1944). Organogenesis in Rubus. Univ. Hawaii Res. Publ. 21:1-234.

ESAU, K. (1942).Vascular differentiation in the vegetative shoot of Linum: I. The Procambium. Amer. J. Bot. 29: 738-47.

FOSTER, A. S. (1935). A histogenetic study of foliar determination in Carya Buckleyi var. Arkansana. Amer. J. Bot. 22: 88-147.

*GAUDICHAUD, C. (1841). Recherches generales sur l’Organographie la Physiologie et l’Organogenie des Vegetaux. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris. 12: 627-37.

GOEBEL, K. (1905). Organography of Plants. Parts I & II. Eng. Trans. 1st Ed. London.

GRAY, A. (1879). Structural Botany, Vol. I. London.

GREEN, J. R. (1897). Manual of Botany, Vol. I. London.

GREGOIRE, V. (1935). Donnees nouvelles sur la morphogenese de l‘axe feuille dans les Dicotylees. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris. 200.

GRIFFITH, A. M. & MALLINS, M. E. (1930). The unit of shoot growth in Dicotyledons. Proc. Leeds Phil. Soc. 2: b125.

GUNCKEL, J. E. & WETMORE,R. H. (1946).Amer. J. Bot. 33:285, 532.

*HOFMEISTER, W. (1851). Vergb. Untersuchungen. (Quoted in Saunders, 1922).

*KOCH, L. (1891). Die Gymnospermen. Jahr. Wiss. Bot. 22:229-242.

LOUIS, J. (1935). L’Ontogenese du Systeme Conducteur dans la pousse feuille des Dicotylees et des Gymnospermes. La Cellule. 44: 87.

MAJUMDAR, G. P. (1942). The Organization of the Shoot in Heracleum in the light of development. Ann. Bot. N. S. 6:49.

Idem (1947). Growth unit or the Phyton in Dicotyledons with special reference to Heracleum. Bull. Bot. Soc. Bengal. I:61-66.

Idem (1949). Leaf Development at the growing apex and phyllotaxy in Heracleum. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sc. 28: 83-98.

MAJUMDAR, G. P. & MITRA,G. C. (1948).The origin and development of stipules in Morus alba. Bull. Bot. Soc. Bengal. 2 (2): 178-185.

MITRA, G. C. (1945). The origin and development and morphology of the ochrea in Polygonum orientale L. J. Ind. Bot. Soc. 26:191.

Idem (1948). Developmental Studies: The Interpetiolar stipules of Rubiaceae with special reference to Paederia foetida and Ixora parviflora Vahl. J. Ind. Bot. Soc. 27:150-166.

Idem (1949). The origin, development and morphology of adnate stipule in Rosa Centifolia L. J. Ind. Bot. Soc. 28:68-83.

*PONZO, A. (1934). Stipule e guaine. Nuova Giron, Ital. 41 (Quoted in Cross. 1937).

PRIESTLEY, J. H. (1929). Cell growth and Cell division in the shoot of Flowering plants. New Phytol. 28:54-81.

PRIESTLEY, J. H.&SCOTT,L. I. (1933). Phyllotaxy in the Dicotyledons from the standpoint of developmental Anatomy. Biol. Rev. 8: 241.

PRIESTLEY, J. H., SCOTT, L. I. & GILLET, E. C. (1935). The development of the shoot in Alstroemeria, and the unit of shoot growth in Monocotyledons. Ann. Bot. 49:161-79.

SAUNDERS, E. R. (1922). The Leaf-skin Theory of the Stem. Ann. Bot. 36: 135-65.

SCHUEPP, O. (1916). Beitrage zur Theorie des Vegetationspunktes. Ber. der. deutsch Bot. Ges. 34:847-57.

SCHOUTE, J. C. (1931). On Phytonism. Rec. des trav. Bot. Neerl. 28:82-96.

SCOTT, D. A. (1909).An Introduction to Structural Botany. I. London.

SHARMAN, B. C. (1942). Developmental anatomy of the shoot of Zea Mays L. Ann. Bot. N. S. 6:245.

SINNOTT, E. W. & BAILEY,I. W. (1914). Investigation on the Phylogeny of the Angiosperms III. Nodal Anatomy and the Morphology of Stipues Amer. J. Bot.

:441-53.

SMITH, B. W. (1941). Proc. Leeds Phil. Soc. 4:42-63.

STASBURGER, E. F. (1930). Text-Book of Botany, Eng. Trans.

STERLING, C. (1945). Growth and vascular development in the shoot apex of Sequoia sempervirens. Amer. J. Bot. 32:118-26.

Idem (1946). Ibid. 33:380-86.

THIESSEN, R. (1908). Bot. Gaz. 46: 357-80.

VINES, S. H. (1910). AN Elementary Text-Book of Botany. London.

Downloads

Published

1952-12-31

How to Cite

Mitra, G., & Majumdar, G. (1952). The Leaf-Base and the Interdone- Their true Morphology. Journal of Palaeosciences, 1, 351–367. https://doi.org/10.54991/jop.1952.416

Issue

Section

Research Articles